| |
Residence
Hundreds of tastings,
all of the music,
all of the rambligs
and all of the enjoyable
(hopefully!)
Whiskyfun.com
Assured ad-free
copyright 2002-2021
|
 |
|
| Hello, that is one in every of our (nearly) every day tastings. Santé! |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
June 5, 2021
|
|
  |
|
|
The vicarious Feis Ile classes
In the present day an Ardbegganza
Celebrating Islay and Feis Ile from Whisky Enjoyable Towers, with fastidiously chosen whiskies from most distilleries, whereas we’re all dreaming of 2022…
|
|
Ardbeg ‘Aaargh!’? Or was it ‘Scraaatch’? Properly I do not suppose we will attempt these barely foolish new flavoured NASses within the close to future. I don’t despise them in any respect, thoughts you, quite the opposite, they might even be fairly good, however right now we have got extra critical stuff on the tasting desk… Please fasten your seatbelts, that is going to be a real old-school session and we cannot do issues by half. Do we are saying eleven, Nigel? What’s extra we’ll attempt to hold this (in addition to ourselves) comparatively vertical… Like, 2001 to 1967? Are you prepared?
|
 |
Journal advert circa 2002. To be cancelled? >
|
|
|
Ardbeg 19 yo 2001/2020 (51.8%, The Single Malts Of Scotland, for USA, refill barrel / 1st fill barrel, 216 bottles) 
Angus already tried this one for these humble pages, however I certain will not miss this chance to attempt some well-aged post-reopening Ardbeg too. Color: gentle gold. Nostril: not an enormous phat Ardbeg, reasonably a mix of recent butter with olive oil and a few type of almondy peatiness at first, and solely then one thing tarrier and extra coastal. Additionally a sense of ashes stored in brine, which is fairly singular, I agree. The entire is extraordinarily good. With water: with iodine and bandages, I discover this one very medicinal as soon as water’s been added. Mouth (neat): kerosene flavoured with bananas and mangos! The latter most likely from some fairly lively American oak, however trumpets please, we have been spared any coconut. Tar and liquorice lozenges, a drop of seawater, some echoes of pad Thai. With water: softened, salted, additionally with extra ashes. End: reasonably lengthy, with a beautiful brine and people inexperienced olives again within the aftertaste, which I am going to all the time cherish, additionally with a bit bitter wooden.. Feedback: we’re flying fairly excessive already. I imply, the scores and stuff, not us! Very brine-y Ardbeg.
SGP:566 – 90 factors. |
|
|
Ardbeg 10 yo 1999/2009 (57.5%, Chieftains Alternative, German Chieftains Society, barrel, cask #114, 228 bottles)
That is post-reopening too. Ian Macleod have had a number of glorious Ardbegs, most at 46% if I bear in mind nicely, however that is cask energy. In brief the Germans’ Alternative (hugs, pals!) Color: straw. Nostril: ultra-clean, zesty, bitter, fermentary and on a great deal of lime. I completely adore this and may’t wait so as to add water with the intention to dig deeper into it with out burning my nostrils. With water: oh, mandarin skins and engine oil, you can’t be in opposition to that. Good. Mouth (neat): we’re not removed from the official 10, solely with 11.5 extra levels. Terribly pure and tight, with simply tar, lemons, seawater, liquorice and cough drugs. Extraordinarily Ardbeg. With water: disintegrates, which means that it is getting extra complicated, which is clearly an ideal factor. A number of citruses, ashes, uncommon oils, hessian, tars, medicines… Key phrase right here: tar. End: identical for fairly a while. Hold the bottle away as soon as you have obtained your pour! Feedback: when the distillate is ideal, and it’s good right here, it is arduous to beat an ideal ten. Bear in mind neighbours Laphroaig’s early 10 C/S?
SGP:557 – 92 factors. |
|
We’re actually too excessive and quick already, given that we have fairly ‘a schedule’ to satisfy… Ha, nothing extra invigorating than self-imposed challenges!
|
|
|
Ardbeg 26 yo (47.2%, Hunter Laing, The Kinship, Feis Ile 2019, refill hogshead, 387 bottles)
Some sources wrote that this was a 1992, others that it’s a 1991, so let’s declare it’s a 1991.5. And why not? Color: white wine. Nostril: I discover it very uncommon, very grassy and bitter, nearly on sauce béarnaise at first (tarragon, chervil, shallot, butter) however the anticipated hessian, tar and simply seawater are quickly to take over. Now some type of curry-mayonnaise-y notes stay there whereas crabs and langoustines are approaching too. I really like this, numerous motion and distinction. The salt of life. Mouth: it’s actually very singular. Extra tangerines and even litchis, with a type of pretend softness (you’ll imagine it is gentle at instances nevertheless it kicks you again) then some type of tarry mustard. Questioning whether or not some type of *** chef hasn’t been engaged on this hogshead. Heston Blumenthal? End: medium to lengthy, all the time with this humorous smoky mustard. Shallots within the aftertaste. Fairly. Feedback: a bit disturbing right here and there however in the long run of the day, it is a gorgeous, softer dram. It is simply that there in all probability is not every other of precisely the identical variety round (though I would not maintain my breath in that division).
SGP:655 – 91 factors. |
|
Not a lot to say about Ardbeg within the Nineteen Eighties. Zzzz zzzz… Let’s soar to the Nineteen Seventies… There, we’ll have rather a lot to say!
|
|
|
Ardbeg 40 yo 1979/2020 (56.8%, Signatory Classic, bourbon barrel, cask #9861, 82 bottles)
That is proper, they had been having this. Signatory all the time appreciated to fly underneath the radars in some respects (which I deeply respect, exactly). Ah, these ineffective digital chatterboxes known as ‘social media’… Let’s additionally do not forget that the sister cask for Kirsch Import (#9859) had been fairly gorgeous. Color: gold. Nostril: let’s be clear, this isn’t ‘too previous’, ‘too oaky’, ‘too drained’ or something like that. That is sorted, let’s transfer on… Some fats Chablis at first (like say Grenouilles in a scorching classic), then actually embrocations and ointments of every kind. That is the principle trait. Additionally mangos and maracuja, oysters, clams, kelp… And that well-known, very emblematic ‘previous fisherman’s boat’ that, I am certain, nobody’s ever seen in actual life. It is in all probability only a descriptor. With water: oh! Ingesting previous chartreuse on a northern seashore. Mouth (neat): no! I imply, sure! Extraordinarily chopping, sharp, blade-y, inform me a few lazy previous malt. Hundreds of inexperienced lemons, lemongrass, chocolate mint (leaves), then a sense of salted smoked artichokes. And all the time this emblematic tar. With water: excellentissimal. Bitter grapefruits, iodine, camphor, tar, oil and paraffin, heavy salted liquorice, tar… Have I discussed tar earlier than? As a result of that is very tarry. Chances are you’ll begin to search for the Anti-Maltoporn Brigade’s quantity, thanks. End: hate it that it will end, however love this salty, smoky, tarry lemon juice. Medicinal aftertaste. Feedback: extraordinarily Ardbeggian, undisputedly, and spectacularly alive and kicking. One more present to mankind, and but once more we are able to solely meditate. To suppose that this factor known as whisky began as an agricultural by-product, two or three or 4 hundred years in the past.
SGP:565 – 93 factors. |
|
|
Ardbeg 1975/2005 (44.7%, OB for Islay Pageant 2005, fino, cask #4719, 188 bottles)
Okay I wrote some quick notes for this one on location, because it was launched. There was additionally an oloroso and the world was separated into two classes, the chums who most popular the oloroso, and those who most popular the fino, so this one. I used to be a part of the primary group however solely fools by no means change their minds, so sixteen years later, let’s give a bit extra consideration to this legendary wee fino… Color: gold. Nostril: boy this was 30 because it got here out. Unbelievable tightness and I might imagine it modified through the years in glass, changing into tighter, extra ‘one’, and extra natural too. What’s certain is that Ardbeg, again in these days, was a fatter spirit. Superb pine-y aromas, tar liqueur, ashes, kelp, with reasonably much less of that meatiness I had detected again in 2005. However did it vanish or have I modified? Mouth: I am going to say it, I appreciated Signatory’s newest even higher. That is very good, naturally, with these grapefruits, this tar, and certainly this salty fino-y character, however I don’t discover it vastly complicated. A little bit of a loss of life seat impact after Signatory’s 40? Maybe… End: no, implausible, grassy and a tad bitter, however with nice tar and a spoonful of espresso dregs. Feedback: wonderful however one step, I imply one level behind the 40. Now I am re-reading my previous notes and can’t not discover that I used to complain fairly vigorously, whereas on location, about the truth that that they had determined to promote this little glory for £180.
SGP:367 – 92 factors. |
|
|
Ardbeg 1975/2006 (40.9%, OB, bourbon, cask #4699, 121 bottles) 
Let’s take our time with this one, the energy being low it might be a bit fragile… There was for instance a really gentle 1975 for Italy that was nearly diaphanous, however granted, it was a sherry (WF 84). So, with extra-care… Color: gold. Nostril: the nostril could be very nice, a bit metallic, extra natural than others, with actually reasonably numerous brine and touches of inexperienced leaves and pips, maybe even a bit dry cider. Tabloids of the day on the airport. Very pretty however nothing earthshattering this time. Mouth: it jogs my memory of the official 17 years previous, bear in mind it? I imagine it was the primary new official Ardbeg after the reopening and reasonably inexplicably, that they had gone for a lighter fashion and solely 40% vol. Anyway, this one’s a bit gentle too, however not flat! It is simply that there is not actually any spine, reasonably a group of tiny flavours, tarragon, clams, cigarette ash, a bit lemon, a touch of caper and a background of moist chalk. Nearly no center. End: not to mention a end. It’s actually gentle Ardbeg. Some almond milk. Feedback: allow us to not be too fussy, the oak had not taken over and it is not change into cardboardy or tea-ish, it’s simply very gentle, and irritating. However I would not refuse a double-magnum.
SGP:355 – 87 factors. |
|
|
Ardbeg 1974/2006 (54.5%, OB, bourbon, cask #3326, 110 bottles)
100 and ten bottles, how uncommon is that this one? Now all these 1974s that that they had bottled round 2005 got here out with a really low outturn, for no causes that I may perceive. In order that they’ve all change into extraordinarily uncommon. This one I had by no means tried, by the way in which. In life, you simply have to attend… Color: deep gold. Nostril: that is like coming house. Smoked bananas and tarry ropes, grapefruit liqueur, recent concrete and previous storage, recent almonds and shoe polish… I do not suppose you are able to do significantly better so far as heavier peaters go. Fantastic austerity. With water: our expensive chalky Sancerre, with a drop of tar liqueur poured in. Mouth (neat): completely big and concentrated, nearly too excessive. I’m joking, that is like claiming that Tyson was too robust. A great deal of bitter oranges, big tarriness, the sensation of consuming a brand new pair of shoes, a ton of mint, licking new Pirellis… Properly this was Ardbeg as in Ardbeg. With water: within the personal phrases of Roy Liechtenstein, wham! Please name the Anti-Maltoporn Brigade earlier than it’s too late. End: what a coda. One of many tarriest there ever was. Feedback: this expertise is sort of animal, there’s nothing to consider, no speculations available, the whisky simply dominates you, whichever your reactions. Whisky for masochists? Maybe…
SGP:568 – 94 factors. |
|
|
Ardbeg 1974/2005 (51.8%, OB, bourbon, for UK, cask #2751, 141 bottles)
I agree 141 aren’t many both. That is one other bourbon, so possibly one other orgasm to count on. By the way in which ever questioned why they by no means did any ‘PX’? Case closed, let’s transfer on… Color: gold. Nostril: oh a humorous sucrosity at very first sniffs, maybe even hints of strawberry cream, however let’s do not forget that might include peat. Typically, while you’re wandering round Port Ellen Maltings (all of us do this, do not we), you do odor strawberry yoghurt. I’ve been advised by some high-ranked officers that that was regular! In any case, this one’s truly reasonably on smoked tea (lapsang), fern and moss, maybe even pu-her, and simply earth and seashore sand. This child retains you ready… With water: ha, these new electronics, plastic luggage, brake pads and shoe polish! Plus inexperienced bananas on the fruit and vegetable division. Mouth (neat): pungent, lemony, austere, ultra-grassy, tarry, salty, actually not straightforward. Very oily mouthfeel, in fact that is nearly oil that is been burning for just a few seconds in your frying pan. With water: numerous spearmint now. That is pretty. End: very lengthy, tight and certainly vertical. The tarriness will get greater once more, and even the aftertaste stays a bit grassy and difficult, on inexperienced walnuts and their skins. Almonds too. Feedback: pure magic, however #3326 would lower it into halves. Ought to a battle happen, naturally.
SGP:468 – 92 factors. |
|
You would not imagine how robust that is, actually. However we’re doing this for the trigger. Let’s simply have a wee break after which we’ll have extra 1974s and presumably some even older ones. As I mentioned, this just for our frequent trigger…
|
|
Good, we’re again, with extra 1974… The subsequent cask they’ve crammed simply after that final one we have tried, truly (S., they’ll learn numbers!)
|
|
|
Ardbeg 1974/2005 (52.1%, OB, for Oddbins, bourbon, cask #2752, 133 bottles)
One other tiny outturn, you see. Color: gold. Nostril: this time it is the smoke from an enormous seashore bonfire that first enters your nostrils, when you marvel if some environmentally inconsequent people have not thrown an previous tyre into the hearth. The beginning grid of a Grand Prix… simply after the beginning. So this one comes very tarry and ‘burnt’, however fairly bizarrely, it’s quickly to change into a lot gentler, with all of the anticipated citrus and recent almonds coming into the dance. Then oysters, seawater, shoe polish, lapsang souchong and embrocations. Somewhat epic. With water: oh recent bread, wool, previous tweed jacket that is seen many wet moons, extra scorching tyres and even, as I typically say, ‘the exhausts of an previous 2-stroke Kawasaki’. Mouth (neat): this arrival could be very citric; you are nearly biting into some Seville orange (inadvertently). So there is a reasonably big bitterness, with a great deal of tar and salt too. Coal tar. Large! With water: a tremendous softness now, this one actually loves water. Comfortable olive oil, tar liqueur, extra lapsang souchong, marzipan, simply olives, maybe half an anchovy, smoked oysters… End: lengthy, on brine and iodine, with some plasticine and shoe polish. The citrus standing again this time. Feedback: nearly a brute when neat, getting mild as a wee Islay rabbit after you have introduced it right down to +/- 45% vol. Magnificent, in fact.
SGP:457 – 92 factors. |
|
Let’s transfer down the years…
|
|
|
Ardbeg 1973/2004 (49.3%, OB, bourbon hogshead, cask #1143, 216 bottles)
Cask #1146, for Italy, was only a star in my e-book (WF 95). I am studying my previous notes and spot that I had deemed that one ‘harmful’. Are we in peril zone once more?… Color: straw. Nostril: again to excessive tart white wines, Sancerre and a few chenins blancs, with an impressive but nicely built-in peatiness, an entire plate of seashells and langoustines (add a lobster if you want), that seashore bonfire… And only a complete, nearly refreshing brightness. Some type of smoked bread too, marzipan, then whiffs of ‘new sneakers’ (near new electronics however not fairly) and only a large model new e-book. A whole lot of ink. Mouth: large boy, extraordinarily ashy at first, with an enormous smoke of Octomore ranges (was the air purifier off?) after which the tartest lemons in the entire world. A really chalky and ashy mouth really feel, reasonably on full- ashtray-mode. Very spectacular, even when it tends to change into a tad rounder over time. Grapefruit juice, fats oysters, and simply touches of vanilla from the cask. End: lengthy, shiny, smoky and ashy, with as soon as once more a bit chenin blanc. Whisky de Loire? Some inexperienced apple liqueur and limoncello within the aftertaste, fifty-fifty. Feedback: it’s a good fashion, each very assertive and type of refreshing. I used to be about to cite these gorgeous whites from across the metropolis of Beaune in Burgundy, however I simply will not this time.
SGP:467 – 93 factors. |
|
Maybe is it time to place an finish to this Ardbegganza, and to have a wee one which was distilled within the swinging Nineteen Sixties? An impartial in that case, that’s to say a type of very legendary sherried dumpies by Signatory Classic…
|
|
|
Ardbeg 30 yo 1967/1997 (50.3%, Signatory Classic, USA, darkish oloroso, cask #1141, 510 bottles)
I’ve already tried this one in 2005 however my tasting notice was too quick. Having mentioned that, the rating had been extraordinarily excessive (WF 95). Allow us to revisit this child right now and provides it a bit extra time… Whereas remembering that sherry monsters normally love additional getting old in glass. So 30 years in a saucy oloroso butt plus 24 years in a bottle, that ought to have labored out super-well… Color: copper mahogany. Nostril: oh… In my little expertise, heavy sherry and heavy peat both simply conflict, or, in just a few instances, create a marvel. This appears to be a marvel, and I am actually pleased I truly did not bear in mind it. Astounding tars and embrocations, liquorice menthol and cigars… And, nicely, it does ground you a wee bit, it is tough to take notes, it’s nearly like while you would reasonably put down your digital camera in entrance of a sundown. Let’s put down our digital camera… Mouth: unbelievable, that is so good! And actually very harmful. I typically prefer to quote Mishima, “true magnificence is one thing that assaults, overpowers, robs, and at last destroys.” Allow us to not fall into this wee Ardbeg’s entice. End: everlasting. Feedback: proper, espresso, camphor, pine resin, menthol, urchins, chocolate, walnuts, tar, tobacco, liquorice, eucalyptus… With all sliders to the highest! Ardbeg’s legend was additionally constructed by the indies.
SGP:477 – 96 factors. |
|
(Heartfelt because of KC but additionally to Lynda, Des, Stuart, Ollie, Billy, Andrew 1, Andrew 2, Anthony… nice, nice work and keenness, everybody!)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
